Ethereality News & Weblog

August 26, 2010

Logitech Z-5500 Digital 5.1 Speaker System review

WEBLOG:
I finally replaced my crappy Creative Inspire P7800 7.1 Surround Speakers System with something a lot better–the Logitech Z-5500 Digital 5.1 Speaker System. When I got the Inspire P7800 a few years ago, it wasn’t really a serious purchase since I wasn’t being picky and simply wanted the cheapest 7.1 system I could find so I could play games in surround sound–something I never got to do before that. I knew the P7800 wouldn’t couldn’t hold up to any kind of serious scrutiny in pro audio or audiophile contexts, but it did the job of letting me know I was getting attacked from behind by enemies by sound alone, which was all I really wanted. The P7800′s sound was fine for gaming, but falls apart for music since the satellites were too shrill in the upper mids and the subwoofer was boomy and muddy as hell with a huge spike from 60Hz to 150Hz–and this is with the sub’s amount set to very low. The subwoofer also rolls off after 60Hz, which isn’t very low at all so there isn’t a lot of meaningful sub-bass frequency being reproduced. And since my studio’s acoustically fully treated, it means that this subwoofer is already performing better than it would in any typical consumer’s living room or bedroom.

The P7800′s surround audio while worked, it was rarely used because I’ve pretty much converted over to console gaming and since the P7800 doesn’t have surround decoder built-in, and I’m not willing to buy additional audio gear just to use those crappy speakers, I got the JVC/Victor SU-DH1 Dolby Headphone Surround Adaptor instead, and it has served me very well since the surround effect is convincing enough to be satisfactory. I could be happy using just the SU-DH1 for all surround sound needs, but there are times I don’t want to be wearing headphones and thus I still need a decent surround speaker system.

For normal everyday audio needs, I have a pair of very old Altec Lancing ACS-90 computer speakers I got from a scrap pile way back in 1998 when I worked at Red Orb/Broderbund/Mindscape, and they are actually quite remarkable for being so small yet very pleasant and natural sounding, (other than a spike at 200Hz, which is typical for small speakers trying to give off the impression that it’s got some bass). Here’s the IK Multimedia ARC System room correction curve of the ACS-90:
ARC-altec_lancing

I’ve actually been using the Altec Lansing with the sub from the P7800 as my everyday computer speaker system, and I only turn on the Klein + Hummel O 300D’s when I’m doing critical listening. Here’s the ARC System’s measurement of the ACS-90 with the P7800′ sub:
ARC-altec_lancing+creative_sub
As you can see, the previously mentioned huge spike in the P7800′s subwoofer’s bass region is very obvious here, and combine that with the spike in the ACS-90′s bass region, it’s a very boomy bottom without much clarity.

After doing some research and reading lots of reviews, I decided on the Logitech Z-5500 Digital 5.1 Speaker System:
Logitech_Z-5500.jpg

It seemed to be the best choice within my budget, and I was not after high-end surround sound for audio production or crazy audiophile home theater–I only wanted something that sounded fairly good and has a good sub-bass extension so I can feel all the visceral power of video game action and movies. In general, I think the Z-5500 met those needs very well. Also, no matter how good Dolby Headphone is for creating the illusion of surround sound, it’s still not quite as good as real surround sound.

The small satellites + subwoofer systems all tend to have recessed mid range frequencies due to the inherent physical design and crossover, and the Z-5500 is no exception, but at the same time, the recess in the mid range isn’t nearly as bad as some I have heard in the past, and it’s not something that bothers me too much. There’s also less treble energy than a neutral frequency response, which I don’t mind that much either–I’ll gladly sacrifice some clarity if that means no shrillness–it’s a fair trade-off in my book. I guess that’s what I like about the Z-5500–at the very basic level, it does no harm, as in it does not have excessive shrillness like many audio products do, and in this aspect, it’s even better than some so-called entry-level “pro audio” reference monitors I have heard in the past (they tend to sound way too bright and fatiguing).

In the bass region, the Z-5500′s subwoofer does have that boomy overhanging resonance from being a ported design that’s always present. Some people might actually like it since they’re used to hearing it in entry to mid-level audio gear and they might think it’s more visceral, but it’s really not a good thing in general because it colors all musical material that way, even ones that shouldn’t have such bass bloom. This is where the big difference between the O 300D and the Z-5500 becomes apparent–the O 300D is just much better designed since it’s aimed at the high-end professional audio market, and it is a sealed cabinet design that doesn’t suffer from bass port resonance, resulting in much tighter and cleaner bass response.

Another problem with the Z-5500 is that at 100Hz, the typical problem with crossovers occurs, where it’s in the netherworld between the satellite and the subwoofer and neither is reproducing that frequency range authoritatively. Once going up to 125Hz, the Satellites starts to take over, and going down to 90Hz the subwoofer takes over. This results in a bass frequency response curve that’s not linear and has weird resonance issues right at the crossover frequency.

Overall, I’m reasonably pleased with how the Z-5500 sounds, since I tend to have low opinion of most consumer electronics–they usually have a very artificial and fatiguing sound with a built-in “disco smiley face” EQ setting that makes the typical uninformed consumers think it sounds good. The Z-5500 doesn’t do that and sounds quite natural. Overall, it’s a lot better than the Altec Lancing ACS-90 and the Creative P7800 subwoofer combo it replaced (I moved that combo to my workout room now). Here’s how the Z-5500 tested with the ARC System:
ARC-logitech_z5500

As you can see, it looks surprisingly neutral for a consumer speaker system. In my studio, I found that additional two bars of subwoofer volume tested slightly more neutral in the sub-bass region, as you can see:
ARC-logitech_z5500-2
for such a modestly priced system, it performs quite well all the way down to 30hz, which matches the sub-bass capabilities of my O 300D’s (though it doesn’t sound as tight or clean).

With ARC System correction turned on for both the Z-5500 and the O 300D, they sound very close in sonic signature, but the O 300D is a more refined and spacious, and the bass is tighter and better controlled. Here’s the O 300D’s ARC correction curves:
ARC-O300D
Kind of ironic that the O 300D’s pre-correction frequency response in my studio is actually less neutral than the Z-5500, and the Z-5500′s price tag is less than one-tenth of the O 300D’s. But of course this is without taking consideration of the actual speaker placement and the acoustic treament. Maybe the Z-5500 simply are placed in a more ideal spot, but I kind of doubt it since I consulted the Klein + Hummel engineers on where I should place the O 300Ds in my studio.

For casual listening, I would be totally fine with the Z-5500, and with the ARC correction turned on, I feel like I don’t even need to turn on the O 300D’s anymore. But for critical audio work, I’d still use the O 300D’s just to be sure I’m getting the best performances in transient response, stereo imaging, soundstage, distortion, control, and resolution. It’s amazing how much of a difference the ARC System makes though–it really is one of the best purchases anyone can make for their computer-based sound system.

The control console for the Z-5500 is easy to use and the remote is handy, but I wish they had separate buttons for effects as well as the inputs on both the remote and the control console, since switching through them tend to be a bit annoying as there’s a delay with each switch you make. But in general I’m happy with this purchase and I think I’ll be content with it for years to come.

Elena and I will be going to Japan for vacation soon. it’ll be the first time for her, and second time for me. I was there once when I was about 10-yrs old, and I loved Japan because it was so advanced and modern, and also, what child doesn’t love Japanese animation and comics and all the giant robot toys? When I was younger, I used to really want to move to Japan and establish a career there as an animation director or manga creator, but now that I’m much older and knows a lot more about Japanese culture and their entertainment industries, it doesn’t appeal to me as much anymore. The animation, comic book, video game, movie, television industries there all have their own problems, and many of which aren’t particularly favorable to foreigners. The internet also allowed a much closer look at life in Japan from afar through the numerous gaijin blogs, discussion forums, youtube videos, and Japanese pop culture has become very popular in the west in the last ten years, so the result is that there’s no longer any mystique left.

Upon objective observation, there are just as many things about Japanese culture I don’t like as there are ones I do like, such as the desire for conformity and homogenization, the veil of politeness and never saying what’s really on their mind (unless they know you well), the blind obsession with western culture, the superficial and shallow side of their entertainment industries, the ridiculous obsession with Lolita Complex, rape, disgusting perversions with bodily functions like puking on each other, urination, defecation, and other nasty stuff that exists in abundance in their shady subculture. Even anime, manga, and the Japanese music scene had changed so much that all the things I loved about them from the 80′s are gone. As far as video games go, I think western developed games have become much stronger than Japanese developed games in general. To date, I have never finished a single Japanese game in my life thus far, but I have finished plenty of western developed games–that says a lot about my taste in games. In a way, this vacation is taking place about twenty years too late, as my fascination with Japan in general has already passed. But it’s still a great place to visit since it’s fun and different from anywhere else on the planet. The food is going to be amazing, and shopping will be a lot of fun. The architecture, interior design, city planning, quality of service…etc will all be fabulous. I’m going to enjoy it no matter what, even if for the sake of satisfying the ghost of my younger self.

I finally finished Dragon Age: Origins. I set it on easy since I didn’t want to waste time dying over and over, but incredibly, even on the easy setting, there are certain parts of the game where I’d have to try many times to win the really hard battles. Overall, I enjoyed the game, and it was longer than I thought it would be. I was sure that the game would end once the Landsmeet takes place, and the rest would happen in the sequel, but then the game kept going–that’s when I realized Dragon Age: Origins will finish what it started–the entire blight storyline.

One thing I hated about the game was the terrible codex navigation (I played the X360 version), since the scrolling to the newly added codex immediately takes away the highlighting of the new one, but navigation window is not large enough to allow you to see where the new ones are, so you must scroll to find them. As soon as you scroll to the new one, it takes away the highlight, and you have no idea if you even have landed on the new one yet. This is not a problem early in the game since you remember which codex you have read, but later on with dozens of them, there’s is no way to remember and it becomes a huge pain in the ass. As the result, I stopped reading the codex because I just couldn’t be bothered, and they didn’t really make any difference in the actual gameplay anyway.

I loved Leliana’s accent–it was basically a French person doing an English accent, and it was one of the nicest accents I’ve ever heard. I even looked up the name of the voice actress (Corinne Kempa) and found her voice acting demo reel on her website and elsewhere. Her other voice acting gigs didn’t sound as appealing to me, and I think what made her Leliana accent unique is the mixture of French and English accent. When she simply spoke a French accent in American English in her other voice gigs, it didn’t sound nearly as interesting. I’m not the only one who’s been smitten by her accent though–a quick Google search shows that there are countless others who have fallen in love with her voice.

On a related note, I always try to romance at least one NPC in any RPG game (if that option is available), and this time, even though I had maximum approval rating from both Leliana and Morrigan, I couldn’t find a way to initiate a romantic relationship. Searching on Youtube I found how others did it, but it was really convoluted–you have to repeat the same conversations multiple times and that’s just bullshit in my book. In RPG’s, as soon as a dialogue tree starts to repeat itself, I stop, because it seems pointless to purposely repeat them unless you simply find it so entertaining that you want to hear the same dialogues again.

One pet peeve of mine is in movies, TV shows, or even in games, when they show someone starts singing, all of a sudden the singing voice sounds nothing like the same person, and there’s reverb processing and accompanying instruments that just appeared out of thin air! I fucking can’t stand that. It’s lazy and it’s clumsy. At least make it sound like it’s actually that character singing, in that same space with the same acoustics, and for God’s sake, no accompanying instruments unless there actually are those instruments right there in the scene. This happened when Leliana sang and it just totally took me out of the narrative and slapped me in the face. This kind of thing is about as bad as putting heavy metal guitars and drum machines into a period piece–there’s just no reason why it should be done, not even if your name is Sophia Coppola.

Another problem I had with the game is how the NPC’s all neatly just disagree on everything and if you pick one action, you’ll always piss off one side. This lead me to only take companions that have the same moral stance so that they won’t disagree. I pretty much always play as a good guy in every game, so I usually pick Leliana, Allistar, and Wyenn (sometimes Zevran). Before Wyenn joined up, I had to put up with Morrigan’s cold-blooded bitchiness because I needed her magic, but as soon as Wyenn joined up, I just left her at the camp, along with Sten, who really pisses me off with his stubbornness.

This is actually the first fantasy RPG I ever finished, since I usually find them a bit repetitive and boring after a while, whereas the sci-fi RPG’s tend to intrigue me a lot more. I now have to finish up Mass Effect 2 since I put that one on hold to play Dragon Age.

Quickie movie reviews:

Au Revoir Les Enfants - I have wanted to see this film for a long time, and I finally did. It’s a very honest portrayal of the friendship that develops between two boys at a boarding school during the time when the Germans occupied France. One of the boys is using an assumed name to hide the fact he’s Jewish, and he’s one of the three Jewish students the school has hidden among the students. I especially liked how organic and natural their friendship developed, going from disliking each other to caring about one another, but not in any contrived manner. The little bumps and lulls along the way are very much like how many friendships form–it’s not always BFF at first sight. I won’t give the ending away, but you can probably guess. The final shot of the film that lingers on one of the boy’s faces is haunting, and expresses so much that was never said in words between the boy. I think for those that attended a boarding school, this film will resonate with them even more, because it portrays life in such a place very vividly.

Hachiko: A Dog’s Story – What a tearjerker. I’ve always been a dog person and I’ve known the story of the real Hachiko for many years now. The movie was surprisingly restrained–obviously, the director knew the dangers of being overly sentimental and steered clear of it. The only slight problem with the movie is that the story of Hachiko, as moving as it is, really doesn’t fill up the length of a feature film, and they did their best to stretch it out without adding too many unrelated elements that dilutes the main focus of the story, which is Hachiko’s loyalty and love for his owner.

Solomon Kane – I wasn’t familiar with this character, but it’s supposed to be one of Robert E. Howard’s creation. I actually like this character better than Conan since he has a lot more depth to him, and the paradox of his blood-thirst and desire to be a better man is far more interesting than any of Conan’s stories I’ve ever come across. I liked that the film takes itself seriously instead of trying to be campy in that wink/nudge smug manner that it could’ve easily been with another director. Rachel Hurd-Wood is such a lovely classic beauty. Angelic and pure girls like that just drive me wild, especially if they have a melancholic aura about them–sort of like injured angels that needs to be rescued.

Deliverance - I have heard about this film for so many years and I finally got around to watching it. I always have a problem with most older films, because the art of cinema has moved on so far ahead in the modern age that the older films tend to feel very slow, meandering, and lack visceral impact. In general I always believe that all art forms, technology, philosophy, politics…etc marches forward and greatly improves upon what we have learned from the previous generations, and with each improvement, making the previous generations’ work appear less refined, overly simplistic, and sometimes even crude or naive. Deliverance by today’s standards is actually very tame and simplistic, without the intense psychological drama or visceral excitement of today’s thrillers. I’m sure the premise was quite thrilling back then and it influenced many of the films that came after with similar premises or stereotypes of scary hillbillies in the woods. I have often even heard characters in movies referring to Deliverance when they are out there in the middle of nowhere, so I know it was a very influential film. But unfortunately for me, I didn’t get to watch it when it first came out (the year I was born), and it just feels too dated at this point for me.

Street Kings – A familiar premise of police corruption, with a ham-fisted score composed by Graeme Revell. During some scenes, the music was just so misplaced and inappropriate. There’s not much to say about Keanu Reeves, since we already know he’s not a great actor. Even Forest Whitaker, whom I like a lot, is a little hammy in the film. Not really recommended but there are far worse films out there.

Funny People – I found this film to be schizophrenic but sincere and honest. The more introspective moments are what are special about this film, when the jokes are put aside and we get a glimpse of the inner worlds of these characters, but when mixed with the more aggressive and corny comedy, it feels inconsistent and awkward. I do think the mixture can work, but it takes a master’s ability to carefully balance the two sides, and unfortunately, the mixture is off in this film and the result is a little messy.

Clash of the Titans – Pretty standard Hollywood action/adventure/special effects flick. It’s entertaining enough with hot women and fun action scenes, and it’s not totally idiotic like some of the worse ones we get from Hollywood. I keep thinking I’d rather see Kratos in a movie tearing shit up though.

The Ghost Writer – Kind of a slow movie and the payoff is a bit disappointing. It’s well-made but I think for today’s audience, it wasn’t edgy enough.

Brooklyn’s Finest – All cop shows and movies are so overdone to death, but we keep watching them, don’t we? Why is that? This one’s not bad–it’s entertaining enough and not particularly cringe-inducing. The performances are good and you care enough for the characters to want to know what happens to them in the end, although you already can guess as soon as each character’s main conflicts in the story was introduced.

July 9, 2010

IK Multimedia ARC System review

SITE NEWS:
It’s been many months since I last updated Kitty Cat Diary, but here it is–the latest entry:

WEBLOG:
Some of you have seen photos of my studio and know that it has extensive acoustic treatment, and my reference monitors are Klein + Hummel O300D‘s. I always knew that despite having built my studio from the ground up and having read books on studio design/construction, consulted experts, and really working at achieving the most accurate and neutral sound in my studio, it still had peaks and nulls. So after researching for a while, I finally decided to get the IK Multimedia ARC System, and I’m happy to say it met my expectations. My studio now sounds about as accurate and neutral as I could possibly make it. The awesome thing is that the ARC can be used in any kind of room, and will dramatically improve the sound quality, even if you don’t already have any acoustic treatments in place. It won’t correct any severe time-domain issues your room might have, but in terms of frequency response and stereo imaging, it really helps, and is especially a blessing for those that can’t use acoustic treatment for whatever reasons (spouse approval, limited space, budget). You might think your speakers and your room sounds fine, but until you put it to the test, you’re likely wrong (and it always seemed strange that audiophiles spend all that money on gear, but the room is totally untreated and the gears never sound like their real potential). ARC will show you just how skewed your room and speakers actually are and then correct them.

There are other products that do similar things like the KRK Ergo, JBL MSC1, dbx DriverRack, Samson D-1500/D250…etc. I chose the ARC because it’s not tied to hardware and it also tests your room in a manner I find most useful. The only caveat is that it is a software plugin, and if you are not running a computer-based audio rig, then you will not be able to use it (unless you want to use a hardware plugin host like the Muse Recpetor or other similar hardware products). For those of you with computer audio rigs, you can host VST plugins in J River Media center (version 14 and up), Media Monkey, Winamp…etc.

So anyway, onto my experience with the ARC.

My initial experience with it sucked–the damn thing kept crashing when I tried to save the preset on computer #1. On computer #2, the test tone would just stop making sound for no reason, and I could never get through the whole testing process without it becoming silent at some point. I tried to download updates from IK’s website (after registering the product and signing in to my account), and it gave me nothing. I looked in the user’s area in downloads, nothing. The download page won’t even load. Looked in support area, nothing. And I kept trying until I got fed up and just downloaded a cracked version, and you know what–it worked. I hated having to do that, but often I had heard that cracked versions fixed problems with the legit versions, and in this case it was true. Anyway, I paid for my copy so I feel no guilt about this. (And no, you can’t just download a cracked version and use it, since it has to use the dedicated testing mic that comes with it, as the software is calibrated to the mic’s specific properties.)

So off I went and did some tests. The first couple of presets I saved didn’t sound right to me–it was kind of limp and the bass was powerless. I was really disappointed. Then the next day, I did a couple more tests restricting the listening area to just normal head movements my body makes while I’m mixing/monitoring–that means, I didn’t tests spots all around the damn chair and where the keyboard and mouse are and just concentrate on the area about the width of my shoulders and about the same front and back of where my head would be. I also adjusted the settings on my monitors (K+H O300D’s) to get closer to the test results the ARC showed. This time, it worked really well–the result sounded very neutral and flat.

I had thought my room was already very well treated as I built my studio from the ground up and researched hard on the acoustics, design, treatment, consulted experts, read books…etc. Those of you that have seen photos of my studio know how extensive the treatment is, with superchunk basstraps up the wazoo, all the important reflection points taken care of, good room dimensions, ideal listening position, and so on. But what ARC revealed (and what I had already kind of known when I did my own tests with a sound pressure meter) was that there were spikes and dips and the two speakers did not sound the same (probably due to furniture placement and other factors). I had spikes at 45Hz, 75Hz, 400Hz, and dips at 125Hz and 1.5KHz, which resulted in a bottom heavy but visceral and punchy sound. The problem is, it colored all the material that way, even material that wasn’t supposed to sound that way. I also had a dip at 2Khz, and the treble/upper-mids were hyped, which resulted in a fatiguing and bright sound.

Here’s ARC’s testing results and correction:
ARC curves

After I applied the correction, the bass spike was tamed and the mids filled in and the treble wasn’t so hot anymore. I used to think t maybe the “neutral” sound of the O300D’s were a bit hotter than what’s comfortable to me–that my ears aren’t used to hearing really flat frequency range around the area that caused fatigue, but now I know–it was the room making things sound that way, and what I heard wasn’t neutral at all. With the correction, all the excessive brightness went away, and everything just sounded smooth and natural. The bass was still authoritative and punchy on material that was mixed that way, and it was smooth and soft on material that was mixed to be smooth and soft. I think that’s a sign that a sound device is neutral and flat–it reproduced the material faithfully, instead of coloring everything with a similar sonic footprint.

Prior to the correction, I also knew that the phantom center was a bit off due to the way I have the furniture and one side of the wall having a window behind the broadband absorbers. Now with the correction, the center was dead on and the stereo imaging was very clean and even between the two sides. ARC allows you to turn on time-delay correction and when I tried it, it moved the phantom center almost all the way to the left, so that wasn’t going to work. But when I turn it off, everything’s just fine.

I spend a lot of time later doing comparisons of correction on and off, and I even used the before/after curve ARC provided to further tweak some very minor spikes and dips that ARC couldn’t completely smooth out in the bass region, and the extra EQ made the K+H’s sound even smoother and tighter controlled (I used Easy-Q, a free high quality EQ for that, but you can use any high quality EQ–preferably a linear phase EQ such as FabFilter Pro-Q, Voxengo CurveEQ, Redline EQ…etc for minimum phasing and distortion). I think I’m finally hearing how the K+H’s are supposed to really sound, after owning them for three years and using them in three different home studios.

For a few hundred bucks, I really think the ARC is worth it. It has confirmed my suspicions about the deficiencies of my already well-treated room, and it has redefined for me what neutral and flat and smooth really means. It even changed my opinion about my headphone collection. I used to use the K+H’s as some kind of benchmark for accuracy to judge my various headphones, but now I realize I had been unfair to some of them when they were actually much more neutral and accurate than I thought they were (such as the Sennheiser HD650)., and certain ones are actually more skewed than I thought they were (such as the Denon D7000).

I also did a preset for my smaller multimedia speakers/sub, which I often use when I’m not doing critical work–like just watching a movie or something, and it worked really well. All the muddiness was gone, and the sound opened up and become much more clear.

So there you have it. I spent the money and I was ready to be disappointed, since I can be a skeptic just like everyone else about these types of products, and I’m glad I wasn’t disappointed. If you have tried it and didn’t like the result, I highly recommend you do the test again but don’t follow the diagrams in the manual. Limit the testing spots to just the area within your body’s width and a head front/back of your listening position, because when you are doing critical monitoring, that’s the area you’ll be restricting yourself to when you’re doing critical work anyway–that sweet spot. Don’t test a large area all over your big console mixer or the width of a sofa, since the result would be a compromise and won’t be very good.

After all these years of never being able to stick to an exercise routine, I think I finally found the answer–martial arts. I had done a little bit of karate as a kid, but nothing serious. Our family is a tennis family, so I grew up playing tennis since about age 11, was on the school’s tennis team, and then as I got serious about creative passions, I started playing less and less. By the time I was an adult, I stopped playing altogether. For many years I didn’t exercise at all–I didn’t even have enough time to try to master drawing, painting, music composition/arrangement, various musical instruments, writing, directing, design, photography…etc. In my late-twenties I played airsoft for a while but it wasn’t something you could do whenever you wanted since you needed other people and a suitable location for a decent game. Although airsoft can be physically demanding when things heat up, it can also have long stretches of minimum physical activity, such as when you are executing an ambush, just laying there in the leaves, waiting for the other teams to walk into your trap. After I met Elena, I tried to occasionally use indoor exercise machines, and we went through a few of them, but it was never consistent and barely did any good. We still have a nice exercise machine at home, but I rarely ever use it, even if I can watch DVD’s while using it–I just can’t stand repetitive and mindless exercise for the sake of the exercise itself–I need fun, excitement, strategy…etc. Perhaps I should’ve kept up with sports since most sports fit that profile, but I really don’t like the idea of having to rely on other people to get anything done, or not being able to do what I want whenever I feel like it (I guess that’s why I quite my 9 to 5 job as studio art director and chose to work at home for myself instead). So in my latest attempt to get a regular exercise routine going, I bought a freestanding punching bag:
punching bag

gloves

I chose fingerless gloves because, well, what happens if my nose itches and I need to scratch it, or the phone rings? Ahhh, pretty smart, eh? The knuckles are all well padded and protected, but it won’t stop me from twisting my wrist if I throw a bad punch.

I’m having a lot more fun exercising now, working on my kicks, punches, instead of something repetitive and boring run on a treadmill or rowing machine. I wish I had a partner to spar with though. Maybe I’ll join a local dojo next.

I’ve picked up Dragon Age: Origins recently, and since last time I didn’t get too far, I decided to go with a different character instead–a mage (last one was a human noble). I find that playing a mage is a lot more fun, since spells in general are a lot more interesting than just bashing away with a melee weapon or shooting arrows. As a mage you get to drain life and add to your own, which is one of my favorite types of spell.

The story thus far has been more interesting than I had expected. I tend to get bored of fantasy stories easily unless they are very intriguing. Most fantasy stories are like tired variants of the Lord of the Ring series and it’s ridiculous how unimaginative they are, especially considering fantasy is supposed to be all about imagining the wildest things that can’t ever be explained by science or history. So what do we get usually? The same fucking dragons, elves, dwarfs, orcs, and the same crap about kings and their thrones, uprisings, and the impending invasion of some demonic army. That is really sad, isn’t it? When I was younger, I used to prefer fantasy more since I loved anything to do with the possibilities of magic, but as I got older, I realized on the average, science-fiction is usually a lot more imaginative and compelling, and the most fantasy are just mindless and derivative. I’m hoping Dragon Age won’t end up telling some variant of the fantasy story we are already too familiar with. I enjoyed Mass Effect a lot, and I hope Dragon Age will be just as interesting.

I finally installed Crysis on my PC and have played it for a while. I suspect I’m about halfway through the game. It’s visually stunning, and it’s hard to believe how much the graphics has improved since Far Cry. I think of Crysis as the real spiritual sequel to Far Cry, since Far Cry 2 was nothing like the first one, while Crysis is practically the same environment and gameplay. I expect things to get even more fun once I start fighting the aliens. The Nano Suit is integral to the gameplay, and it’s on the verge of being frustrating since energy drains too quickly–to the point of being barely able to keep you alive in many situations.

I finally tried S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Shadow of Chernobyl too, and it was such a disappointment. With today’s games being so polished, this game was like a build that was at least six months away from the beta milestone. It felt so dated and clunky that I just couldn’t stomach it. Maybe we are spoiled by all these big budget AAA titles made by teams of hundreds, but that’s just how it is.

I finished Uncharted: Drake’s Fortune, and I forced myself to only because I wanted to play Uncharted 2. It wasn’t as good as I had hoped, with predictable patterns of AI routine, repetitive gunfights, and the intrigue of supernatural elements didn’t start until too late in the game, and it was by far the most interesting aspect of the game. The final boss’s A.I. routine was so bad that I couldn’t believe it–he would take three blindly fired shots from behind cover, and one pop up and take one aimed shot–all in the exact same spot. This pattern repeated over and over and over, and every time you kill all his backup, he would run to the next set piece and do the same routine all over again. Seriously, that kind of lazy A.I. programming is so outdated that you really can’t get away with it in the 21st century. It just looks stupid. I also hated some of the enemy dialogues–cheesy gems like “You’re mine, punk!” or “You’re dead!” or “Blast him!” This is one thing that videos games are really, really bad at. Why can’t the writers actually write believable dialogues for the enemies during firefights? What about simple and logical ones like “Cover me!” or “Reloading!” or “Flank him!” or “I’m out of ammo!” or something with a bit more personality like “C’mon! He’s just one guy! We can take him!” The last game I played that had really idiotic enemy dialogues was The Darkness, where all the enemies–hundreds of them, knew you by name, yelled out insults to you like you have a history with every single one of them, and hated you with seething passion as if you raped all of their daughters. It was so bad that I was dumbfounded. But as I mentioned, I only played Drake’s Fortune so I could play the sequel, which won a lot of awards and was highly regarded. I wouldn’t say Drake’s Fortune is bad at all–it was quite good in some ways, but the lasting impression is that it could’ve been a lot more exciting and fun.

So now that I’ve played a little of Uncharted 2: Among Thieves, I can say that it’s definitely an improvement over Drake’s Fortune, but it’s got its own issues, such as the “stealth” sneaking around while knocking out the museum guards one by one. I know they can’t exactly do a very realistic take on it, since it would probably change the tone of the game into something much more serious, but how they handled it was just so ludicrous that I can’t help but think there must be a better way to make the gameplay more believable. Guards were standing no more than a couple of meters away from each other and they can’t hear you punching living daylights out of their fellow guards? What, are they all listening to iPods? Also, you could practically run around as long as you are not in the direct straight-line sight of the guards. Did these guards somehow lose their peripheral vision when they took the job? Also, all the noise created from raising and lowering the gate and no guards noticed?

Maybe it’s just me, but I really dislike the so-called “stealth” in most games. They are about as logical or realistic as enemies who can take entire clips from a gun and not go down. I’ll continue to play Among Thieves just to see if the story is any good, and I hope it at least improves upon all the weaknesses of Drake’s Fortune.

Noticed I didn’t mention about the visuals, audio, or writing, and I think it’s because when there are glaring gameplay issues, it overrides everything else for me. Both are AAA titles so obviously they excel in graphics and audio. The writing is pretty good–typical pulpy movie type of writing. It’s good enough to be entertaining, and I think that’s all it’s meant to be.

Quickie movie/TV reviews

It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia (season one) – My brother Dennis recommended this one. It reminds me a bit of Seinfeld, where all the characters are selfish, immoral, and the humor is all based on political incorrectness. But then again, it seems that’s what all comedies are based on these days.

Mad Men (Season Three) – Another excellent season of one of the most intelligent TV series every created. My brother Michael is the director of accounts at a large international ad agency, and his co-workers told him he must watch the show. Strangely enough, he said he didn’t really get it or enjoy it. I don’t understand why–he’s certainly intelligent enough. I guess he just doesn’t see it the way I do–that it’s a fascinating portrait study of an era in American history, or how the characters are complex and vivid, playing out their roles in a society that was fast losing its willful innocence. Don Draper is one of the most complex and mysterious characters I’ve seen in any TV show, and I can’t wait to find out what happens to all the characters in season four.

Sons of Anarchy (season one) – Another show my brother Dennis recommended, and it’s pretty good. By the end of season one, you realize you’re watching a retelling of Shakespeare’s Hamlet, but with motorcycle gangs. I enjoyed it enough to want to see how it plays out, but I don’t have high expectations for it like I do some of my favorite shows like Breaking Bad, Mad Men, The Office, Entourage, The Wire…etc.

4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days – This film had such rave reviews and I could see why, although I think this type of film appeals to a very specific audience–namely the arthouse fans. It reminded me a lot of Rosetta and L’Enfant in its very realistic and almost real-time depiction of a mundane event in the lives of very average people. While I can appreciate these types of films, in general it’s not the kind of execution I prefer, since so many of the wonderful cinematic language and devices we have invented are off-limits in this kind of filmmaking.

The Crazies – I’ve never seen George Romero’s original version, but I enjoyed this remake. It was well-executed, and although I mistakenly expected pulse-pounding thrills in the form of an entire town of infected zombies, I wasn’t disappointed.

Green Zone - One of the most tense and thrilling movies I’ve seen in a long time. It’s basically like having Jason Bourne as a Chief Warrant Officer in Iraq tasked with finding WMD’s, and then follow him as he uncovers the ugly lies behind it all. Well, except that there’s no super human assassin bad-assness–just gritty realism of war.

Shutter Island - I really hate the fact that as someone who writes, I often can see a plot twist coming from 10 miles away, and it always ruins the surprise and the fun. I knew the plot twist to this film as soon as DiCaprio stepped onto the island. There was a quick shot of the armed guards reacting to him arriving, and it was so obvious to me how the movie would end right there and then. I don’t know why Scorsese was so heavy-handed with that particular shot–it doesn’t seem like something he would do. I was also a bit surprised by the lighting in a scene where he’s lighting matches in order to see in the dark. It was just a badly thought-out lighting situation where the ambient light was way too bright to look like a match-lit scene. I’ve seen these kinds of scenes lit very convincingly before, and I was disappointed to see a badly lit one in a film by a master. Overall I enjoyed the film and I think it’s one of his more accessible films in a long time, along with The Departed.

Book of Eli – If you don’t take the story too seriously and just enjoy the ride, it’s quite entertaining. Definitely make sure your suspension of disbelief is activated, especially for the ending.

She’s Out of My League – This movie felt a little schizophrenic to me. On one hand, it’s a sincere romantic comedy with a lot of heart, and on the other hand, the bromance and excessive juvenile aspects often felt like the creators were trying too hard to mimic the current trend, despite that the tone didn’t mix well with the rest of the film.

Bodyguards and Assassins (十月圍城) – My brother Michael recommended this film, and after watching it I wondered what the hell he was smoking. It was a terrible film that squandered an awesome premise, and it’s hard to forgive the filmmakers for it because it really is a very unique premise. It’s basically about when Sun Yat-sen went to Hong Kong to rally support for the revolution to overthrow the Chin Dynasty and bring about a new, modern China. The officials planned to assassinate Sun and use him as an example to discourage further dissenting activities. The underground resistance fighters make plans to escort and protect Sun during his one-hour talk with supporting representatives from the thirteen regions of China, and they must keep him alive and allow him that one hour to convince the representatives to support the cause, as it would change the course of history. That in of itself would’ve been an amazingly tense political thriller, but the idiots behind the film somehow decided to turn the entire second half of the film into laughably clichéd wire-fu martial arts brawl-fest. They completely cheapened the historical significance of the premise and went for all-out action entertainment aimed at the lowest common denominator–the kind of shallow audience who couldn’t sit through a movie without explosions and fist fights. Obviously, the historical event had no wire-fu fights.

There were other sloppy filmmaking and bad decisions, such as when they showed a man chasing after a horse-cart for blocks, running at top speed, and then when he stops to look at his daughter (for the first time), his breathing was perfectly normal. Who makes that kind of idiotic mistake anymore? Then there’s the use of rock electric guitars in the film score. I can’t stand that–when period films use very modern music styles and instruments. And there’s also people beating the crap out of each other with bare knuckles but their hands are perfectly fine and normal looking afterwards. I think in general, most Chinese filmmakers are still far behind the curve in terms of cinematic sensibility compared to the west. This film, plus the recent failed attempts to emulate Lord of the Rings type of fantasy epic (every single one of them was completely idiotic and horrible), really shows how limited of a range the Chinese filmmakers have. They excel in the oppressive and depressing dramas, but not much else really. There are only a tiny handful of Chinese directors who are worth watching–the rest are just wasting celluloid.

Taking Woodstock – I watch anything Ang Lee directs, since I find him to be a sensitive and versatile director. I was a little surprised by his choice of material this time around, since it’s been a very long time since he did a comedy. I enjoyed the film for the story and the character relationships, even if that era was way before my time and I have no emotional attachments to it.

Hot Tub Time Machine – I was happy to see John Cusack returning to his comedic roots. It feels a bit like jumping on the “bromance comedy with lots of foul language and juvenile humor” wagon overall, but that’s the trend for comedies these days I guess. I was entertained, laughed at a few jokes, and in general had a good time.

Youth In Revolt - I was mostly surprised by how safe and monotonous this film was. I guess my expectations were much higher. It reminds me a bit of being like an inferior Wes Anderson comedy. Michael Cera’s played out that sweet but awkward nerdy character by now, and if he doesn’t reinvent himself as an actor soon, people are going to lose interest in whatever he’s going to do next.

Law Abiding Citizen - While it’s easy to side with the vigilante mentality because we readily identify with a man who had to watch his wife and children murdered in front of his eyes, but as the movie went on, the entire premise and moral stance just loses resonance as things got more and more ridiculous and the bodies start piling up, including those who are totally innocent. If this movie had a moral message, it was so muddied and convoluted by the end of the film that you just can’t buy into the way the message was conveyed.

June 5, 2010

Taiwan trip, and headphone comparisons

WEBLOG:
Elena and I just returned from our trip to Taiwan. We first went to Hong Kong for a couple of days, then to Taiwan for a week. We’ve been to Hong Kong many times before, and we mostly stopped by to visit a friend and also to take care of some Taiwan-entry paperwork.

My mother bought a home recently in Taipei, so we stayed with her. We walked all day every day while we were there, and my feet hurt so bad that sometimes I didn’t think I could take another step. For the last couple of years, I rarely went out, so my feet were not used to walking so much. We also ate so much, since Taiwan is famous for its street food vendors and variety of local, foreign, and fusion cuisine. It’s impossible to not stuff yourself when you visit the night markets, which we did almost every night. This is what the night markets look like:
night market 1

night market 2

night market 3

night market 4

night market 5

night market 6

We don’t usually eat Chinese food when we go out (unless another person in the party prefers Chinese), since we love to try food from different cultures, and Taiwan is relatively cosmopolitan (though not to the degree that Hong Kong is) in terms of having different cuisines and inventing their own fusion cuisines that borrow from other cultures:
fusion cuisine 0

fusion cuisine 1

fusion cuisine 2

fusion cuisine 3

fusion cuisine 4

fusion cuisine 5

fusion cuisine 6
As you can see, western cuisine is readily available in Taiwan, and it’s authentic and tasty, not like the crap you get in China where they alter western food so much that it tastes like some kind of indistinct and bland crap that masquerades as western cuisine, but in reality is anything but. Other Asian cuisines like Japanese, Korean, Thai, Indian…etc are also readily available in Taiwan, and it’s all good.

Taiwan is known for having an abundance of yummy fruits, and that is reflected in the many street food vendors selling beautifully cut and delicious fresh fruits (and they really are delicious–to the point where I wondered if additional flavoring was added, like sweetening). It’s also amazing that all the fruits were absolutely flawless–not a single one had less than perfect coloring, shine, or ripeness. Here’s what one of these fruit stands look like:
yummy fruits

yummy fruits 2

There’s even bitter melon juice, which intrigued me since I normally hate bitter melon due to its horribly bitterness. Turned out there’s a special kind in Taiwan that’s white (it’s usually green) and it’s not nearly as bitter (in fact, it has a sweet aftertaste), while still maintaining the same health benefits (which is to “cool down” your system):
bitter melon
If you have never heard of it before, the whole concept of foods being “warm” or “cool” is a concept in Chinese medicine (it has nothing to do with temperature, but the “qi,” or energy) where the different energies of food are like ying and yang, and you have to balance them in your diet. When you eat too much warm foods, you might get sores in your mouth, nose bleeds, and other symptoms, which you then counter with cool foods. But if you have a weak digestive system, cool foods will only make it worse, so you have to eat warm foods. I’m on the fence in general about Chinese medicine, as some of it really does seem to work, and does things that western medicine can’t do, while some of it just seems like superstition B.S. to me.

Taiwan has famous local delicacies–one like like sticky rice with pig’s blood (one of my favorites), oyster noodles, braised pork rice…etc. Of course, the famous bubble tea is a Taiwan invention as well. Here’s the stinky tofu, which is another one of its famous local delicacies:
stinky tofu

When we went to the Cold Stone Creamery, we saw some interesting local creations like these:
Cold Stone Creamery 1

Cold Stone Creamery 2

Taiwan’s shaved ice desserts are also quite famous:
Shaved Ice
Asian’s love tea-flavored desserts, as well as sweet red beans, plums, ginger, taro (ube), sweet potatoes, condensed milk, mangoes, peanuts, bubble jelly, brown sugar, lychee, passion fruit…etc, as shown in the photo above, and the Asian variants of Cold Strone Creamery creations generally fall along those lines too.

Other than being tasty, food in Taiwan is also far safer than the toxic crap in China, and it’s also quite cheap, so you can really eat until you burst and your wallet would barely feel the impact, although your stomach surely will.

While strolling through one of the night markets, we saw this cozy little square–it reminded me a little of bit places like the Ghirardelli Square in San , except much more modest:
Garden Mall 1

Garden Mall 2

Garden Mall 3

Garden Mall 4

Garden Mall 5

Garden Mall 6

Taiwan’s been making an effort to clean up its streets, with stricter laws about littering and garbage, and this effort could be seen clearly with recycling carts like this one:
recycle cart

We even snapped a photo of just the street to prove how much cleaner it is compared to China, during a brief moment when a stretch of the night market was less crowded:
clean street
Pretty amazing. That’s something you’d never see in China, especially in crowded night markets filled with seas of people who litter like it’s nobody’s business.

Elena pays particular attention to how a city incorporates trees and plants into its overall environment, and Taiwan was pretty good in general:
greens in the city 2

greens in the city 3

greens in the city 4

Even those who lived in places that had no room for planting anything, went out of their way to do it anyway, which shows how important plants are to them:
greens in the city 1

greens in the city 5

Elena really loves gardening and plants, so we had to visit the biggest flower market in Taipei. It was gigantic, Elena was like a little kid in a candy store:
flower market 1

flower market 2

flower market 3
The vendor stalls continued on and on, and lasted for a few blocks. I’ve never seen a flower market that big before in my life–it was just insane. Elena wished she had a gigantic backyard so she could haul back everything she ever wanted to grow. For now, she’ll have to be content with our modest apartment balconies.

When we strolled through a park, we noticed the squirrels in the park were pretty bold–running up to people to eat food out of their hands:
squirrels

Elena and I both noted that girls in Taiwan are in general better looking and better dressed/made-up than girls in Hong Kong or China–it’s not just a vague impression–we actually analyzed the facial features and the number of attractive girls are indeed more numerous, and they don’t include the ones that pile on so much makeup that you could barely see what the person actually looks like. We have a low tolerance for caked on makeup, fake eyelashes, heavy eyeliners and eyeshadows…etc–they just look so fake and off-putting. We discussed the psychology behind this behavior, and I guess it comes down to this–if you’re an unattractive girl and piling on the makeup can turn you into someone significantly more attractive, even if the the price you pay is to lose any sense of naturalness about you–essentially wearing a mask that looks nothing like you, would you do it? I guess it depends on your priorities, values, and what your idea of personal pride and self-esteem is.

One day we were just walking down the street, and we saw some photographer taking photos of this person who to me looked like a transvestite, because she just looked so odd, and upon closer look, we realized it was Bai Ling, who was in Taiwan maybe promoting something. I’m not really a fan of hers, since she’s the type that tries so hard to be risque and wild that it just comes off as cheap attention-whore behavior (plus she’s likely certifiably insane based on the kind of stuff she says during interviews). Elena and I couldn’t be bothered to take a photo of her, but my mom did. If she was really hot, then it’s possible to overlook her personality, but being kind of awkward-looking (what she’s done to herself, not how she naturally looks), there was just no point.

Elena and I visited Taichun for a day since people keep telling us how cities outside of Taipei are slower paced, less hectic, more hospitable, and the people kinder and more sincere. We were not prepared to find none of it true, except for the slower paced part. The places we visited had noticeably worse attitude and quality of service–from taxi drivers, restaurant waitresses, to ticket window clerks. There were also less interesting places for shopping and food, and there’s no subway system either. We were disappointed overall, and I think we’d much prefer to stay in Taipei in the future. Speaking of quality of service and attitude, we were surprised by how good they were in Taipei–people would go out of their way to help you, and they were so friendly that we just couldn’t believe it. It’s different from the ultra-polite Japanese–sort of like a more humanized version where the politeness is combined with sincerity and friendliness–basically less fake and more real.

Though there isn’t as much to see in Taichun, it still has similar night markets and shopping districts like the ones in Taipei, though much smaller in scale and not as glamorous (nothing like Taipei’s 101 shopping mall). This little shopping district in Taichun was kind of cozy:
Taichun 1

Taichun 2

Taichun 3

Taichun 4

While browsing the book/CD/DVD stores in Taiwan, I bought three CD’s:

White Shoes & The Couples Company / Self-titlted - An interesting retro 70′s pop band from Indonesia, which is actually now signed to Minty Fresh Records in Chicago. The music is a little bit like the first couple of albums from The Cardigans, but more willfully retro. They even wear 70′s clothes exclusively, which is kind of unfortunate because it’s perhaps the worst decade for fashion ever.

Daiqing Tana (代青塔娜) & Haya Band / Silent Sky (寂静的天空) – An intoxicating mixture of Mongolian ethnic folk, world fusion, and modern songwriting/production. Daiqing Tana’s voice is beautiful and soulful, while the music is atmospheric and haunting.

He Xuntian (何训田) / Tathagata (如来如去) – New age/world music that uses Buddhist philosophies are its main theme. I find most new age/world music to be laughably bad because they tend to be really shallow and exploit whatever culture they latch on as a gimmick, but this is much better than the usual stuff from that genre, as the producer is a respected composer and the ethnic leaning are authentic and interesting–in other words, it’s not just some white guy trying to play ethnic music from a culture he barely understands. The music in Tathagata is also not like typical new age/world music, which is essentially easy-listening music played with ethnic instruments in exotic scales–Tathagata actually tries to explore some central ideas in Buddhism and the music has muscle and ethereal beauty combined.

While in Taiwan, I talked to some insiders about the state of the music industry there currently, since I was a part of that scene briefly about fifteen years ago. Back in the mid-90′s I went back to Taiwan to pursue a career in music, and I sold a song to a famous popstar at the time, and also wrote some songs for other popstars, but they were rejected because my style was too indie/underground/alternative/edgy. I befriended the underground bands around at the time like Assassin (刺客), Groupie (骨肉皮), and that was the crowd I hung out with during my stay there. I observed how anything that wasn’t commercial mainstream music had no chance of making a decent living doing what they love, and how bland and mindless the public’s taste was in general when it came to music. When one of the arranger/producers told me how I ought to use specific piano patches from a specific keyboard workstation because that was the sound the public was familiar with, or how many “songwriters” just take the A verse from another song and mix it up with the B verse from another song and voila! A new song. I was thoroughly disgusted, and decided that Taiwan’s music scene was still too backwards and I’d rather be a small fish in the ocean (the States) than be in a small pond (Taiwan). There also wasn’t much of a comic book industry either, and at that time, music and comic books were my main focus, so I really didn’t see a point in staying (despite the fact I was really in love with a girl (who owned a bar and was a bass player) and we had just started dating).

I’ve always been curious about how my life would’ve turned out if I had stayed in Taiwan–not because I think I could’ve had a brilliant career there as a musician or comic book creator, but because I think it would’ve lead to some really memorable and interesting life experiences. Life in the States moves a lot slower, and things don’t change that much over time, but in Asia, the entire social landscape is always changing so fast, and you experience a lot more in a lifetime than you would in the States (relatively speaking, as it ultimately still depends on your lifestyle).

Anyway, what I learned was that the music industry has changed a lot, just like it has all over the world due to the internet, MP3′s, advancement of DAW computers for music production…etc. Pretty much all the big recording studios have closed down in Taiwan, as everyone now just produces in their own home studios or small private studios–even the A-list musical artists. Mainstream music isn’t making any real money and the popstars all get their income from TV appearances and commercials, concerts, merchandising…etc. The ones who are purely musicians and producers are all having a hard time as there’s no money to be made in selling CD’s, and many turn to scoring for films, TV shows, video games, and so on. But what’s interesting is that in the last decade or so, indie/underground music has exploded, and while they don’t make any money selling CD’s either, they are strong in live performances, so live houses are their main source of income. Some also turn to teaching music in schools or privately. Essentially, it’s much like how it is everywhere else in the world–the music industry has completely changed in the last ten years or so. The fact is, even if I stuck with music, I would probably never live as comfortably as I did working in video games and CG, and it’s debatable if I’d have been happier, since all the business and politics of the music industry would take away from the joy of making music.

It’s kind of pointless to ponder too much about how my life could have been, especially that if I had stayed in Taiwan, I’d have never met Elena, and I wouldn’t have the happy marriage I have now.

I got to see some of the siblings I have on my dad’s side while in Taipei. The last time I saw them was about fifteen years ago (and prior to that I have never met any of them except for the two oldest ones that I lived with for a few years before I moved away to live with my mother and step-father. The two oldest girls have no memories of me even though I took care of them when they were babies and toddlers). Last time I saw them, the oldest was sixteen, and now she’s thirty-one. In the past, we haven’t really had a chance to have any kind of a relationship because I haven’t been a part of that family since age nine, not to mention I grew up in the States while they were in Taiwan. Now we’re all adults, and the internet having changed the social dynamic of our society, it’s actually possible to have a relationship even if we live in different countries.

I have sometimes wondered how my life would’ve been if I had stayed in Taiwan and lived with my dad and step-mom instead of moving to the States with my mom and step-dad. I don’t know if I would’ve been allowed to stay with that family anyways when my dad abandoned everyone and started another family (his third). I mean, sure, I was the half-brother to the five kids, but would my step-mom have wanted me to remain with them, or just sent me to live with my grandparents since it would’ve been impossible to raise six children on her own? She’s really an amazing woman since she managed to raise all five kids by herself, and they all turned out well. Perhaps their lives could’ve been a little easier if I was there to share the burden and be the protective big brother. Or maybe I’d just add to the mess and make things worse–I’ll never know. Although we share the same father, we don’t really know much about each other–practically strangers. It would be interesting to get to know them and see where it takes us. I found them on Facebook the other day, so that’s a good start I guess.

Before we arrived in Taiwan, we spent a couple of days in Hong Kong, and I visited KingSound Headphone Shop (金聲耳筒專門店, http://www.headphonehk.com) and tried out a few headphones I’ve always wanted to test. I even brought my Denon AH-D7000 and Westone 3 with me on the trip so that I could do comparison tests with it. I have a CD that I use especially for testing studio monitors speakers and headphones, which starts off with pure sine waves at various frequencies–this is to test how neutral/flat something is, and it goes from 16Khz all the way down to 30Hz, not in a sweep, but repeating important frequency tones 3 times at each interval. Then I have all kinds of music that ranges from orchestral, electronic, jazz, rock, acoustic/voice, and so on, each track testing specific things like sub-bass presence, bass texture/detail, neutrality, instrument/voice body/texture, percussion impact/texture/detail, soundstage, shrillness, muddiness…etc. On the Zen player, I also have these same tracks.

Here are some thoughts on the models I listened to:

Sennheiser HD800 – I have listened to the HD800 twice (once in Hong Kong, and once in Taiwan), and I never really warmed up to it. Its clarity and resolution sounded artificial to me instead of natural, and it had no authority in the sub-bass region (before anyone starts mentioning amps, I listened to it with the SPL Phonitor and the Corda Symphony.2, both of which are excellent amps). I’m one of those people who simply cannot consider a pair of headphones to be “amazing” or “the best of” if it’s lacking neutrality in a chunk of the frequency range. A amazing pair of headphones should sound like a full-range speaker system that reaches down to 30Hz and remains substantial and authoritative–anything less than that is not “amazing” to me. It’s sort of like if a girl is really hot with an awesome body, but her ass is flat, barely able to fill any pair of jeans–would that still be considered an amazing body? Not in my book. Even the HD650 has more sub-bass extension and weight, and it costs far less than the flagship HD800 model. I understand that there’s a portion of people whose idea of neutral bass is in fact anemic bass to me, and I stand my ground on the issue because anyone who’s ever heard a full-range speaker system that reaches down to 30Hz or lower, will know that neutral bass in in fact quite authoritative and substantial. There are headphones out there that can reach down low and feel very authoritative–for example, the Stax 007MKII, Denon AH-D7000, Audio-Technica ATH-M50, ES-10…etc, so it’s not like the HD800 is somehow limited by physics–it was a choice the engineers at Sennheiser made.

AKG K701 – I have been recommended the K701/702 many times before and I finally got to hear one in person. I actually liked it a lot, as it sounded smooth, detailed, open, and articulate, but the caveat was the anemic mid-bass presence. Although the K701′s sub-bass is well extended, its lighter mid-bass turns the overall presentation into something less than ideal. It’s really a shame because that’s the only real weakness it has, and if it had more mid-bass presence, it could very well be one of the best headphones out there. The K701 is very comfortable, and visually it’s one of the best looking headphones out there.

AKG K601 – I agree with the people who say it’s a more balanced sound overall than the K701, but neither had the authoritative bass I’m looking for. Aside from the lack of authoritative bass presence, I really liked both of the AKG models.

Ultimate Ears Triple.fi 10 Pro – The Triple.fi sounded quite warm and didn’t have the kind of articulation/clarity/air I prefer (which is one of the things I don’ t like about the Westone 3). The sub-bass wasn’t as extended as could be either.

Westone UMX3 – The UMX3 was more balanced than the Westone 3, without that really bloated mid-bass, but it’s still not there in terms of clarity and air.

Etymotic ER-4P – I really liked the ER-4P because it’s got great clarity and articulation, but its bass was just not substantial enough, which is a shame, because it’s not something you can just EQ with your MP3 player, since typical EQ’s on players do not extend into the sub-bass region.

Of all the IEM’s I’ve tried to date, I think only the Shure SE530 got close to having a good bass extension without that bass bloat like so many IEM’s (the W3 for example). I would love to try the JH13/16 one day since they’re probably the only IEM’s capable of that big full-size headphone sound.

SPL Phonitor – I was lucky that there was a Phonitor available in the store, and I mostly wanted to test out its crossfeed feature. After trying out its crossfeed, I actually preferred the $27 plugin I bought not long ago called Isone Pro, which sounds much more realistic to me in terms of simulating a pair of speakers in a room. As for all the fancy electronics like the converter or the amps inside the Phonitor, I have to say I really feel that these thousand dollar+ headphone amps are total overkill, especially if the headphone is low impedance in the first place (like the D7000). I’ll talk more about amps later when I get to the Corda Symphony.2.

While in Taiwan, I called and reserved listening time at Music Hi-Fi Co. (音悅音響, http://www.hifi.com.tw) in Taipei, and here are some thoughts on the models I tested (all dynamic headphones were amped with the Corda Symphony.2, and I even A/B’d the Symphony.2 against straight out of the Creative Zen’s headphone output):

Stax 007 MKII + SR-717 – I have seen people comment that once you try electrostatic, you might get hooked, and being a musician who’s familiar with the concept of condenser microphones, which uses a similar concept, I had some idea of what to expect (and I do prefer the condenser mic sound overall to dynamic mics, since it’s more nuanced, detailed, sensitive, and textured). Originally I had hoped to test the 4070, but it’s a special order only item at the store. They suggested the 007MKII instead, saying that most people prefer it over the 4070 anyway because the 4070 isn’t as comfortable, and the 4070′s sub-bass isn’t all that more prominent, while sounding a bit more congested since it’s closed-back (I don’t trust what they say since they could be just trying to get me to buy the 007MKII instead). The 007MKII was very comfortable–snug like the DX1000 and W1000X, as opposed to a very light clamp like the D7000.

I loved the sound of the 007MKII. It’s so amazingly natural sounding that I couldn’t help but smile from ear-to-ear. Voices and instruments sounded so textured, full-bodied, yet clear and smooth, with no hint of any unnatural coloration, sibilance, artificial dip or spike in any frequency range. Dynamic headphones just pale in comparison, sounding artificial and forced–like the engineers used all kinds of tricks to push, pull, squeeze and mold the sound into their ideal, but leaving all kinds of fingerprints behind in the sound–little anomalies here and there–like the fake Hd800 sound, or the strangely distant treble on the DX1000, or the somewhat sharp upper mids/lower treble of the D7000 and DX1000…etc.

What else is amazing about the 007MKII is that even though 30Hz is a bit rolled-off, it doesn’t not seem to take away the sub-bass authority of the headphone–the sub-bass remains full-bodied, rich, tightly controlled, textured, and I couldn’t figure out how that’s possible. It slams and punches and booms just as well as the D7000, while sounding perhaps even more natural at it, and still matching the power, heft, and lushness of the D7000.

The treble is articulate and smooth, and makes dynamic headphones’ treble seem kind of squeezed and fake. It’s not as sharp but it’s very clear and defined, whereas most dynamic headphones’ treble sounds EQ’d in comparison. The mids are also so smooth and textured–when I listened to orchestral string, I can actually hear and “feel” the horsehair of the bows rubbing against the strings–something I have never heard or felt with any dynamic headphones–ever. Voices also sounded so natural–it’s almost like dynamic headphones’ reproduction of voices are like girls who are only pretty after they’ve piled on the makeup, while the voices I hear on the 007MKII are naturally beautiful–no need for makeup at all.

I also found that because the 007MKII sounds so natural, it doesn’t need to be lush in any artificial manner–its naturalness is just naturally lush–so hard to describe it, but oh so beautiful to listen to.

I was really hoping that electrostatic headphones are just all hype and audiofool insanity, so that I don’t have to go down that expensive road to reach my audio nirvana, but goddammit everyone was right–the Stax is no joke–it’s the king–the one headphone to rule them all. Now I’m facing the fate of my bank account being short thousands of dollars sometime in the future.

Here’s the 007MKII wih the SR-717 amp:
 Stax 007MKII + SR-717

Victor/JVC HA-DX1000 – I finally got to test a pair of DX1000 against the Denon AH-D7000, and right off the bat, the treble just sounded odd–it’s kind of distant and muffled, but still articulate–as if the treble existed in a different plane of space. The sub-bass wasn’t as extended as the D7000, with 30Hz being rolled off–in fact the right driver started buzzing at 45Hz and lower (D7000′s 30Hz remains just as prominent as the other bass frequencies, with no sign of roll-off, and no sign of distortion). My M50′s 30Hz is also struggling a bit, with a little bit of distortion, but seems better than the DX1000. Even if the DX1000′s right driver wasn’t misbehaving at sub-bass frequencies, the 30Hz area was roll-off anyways.The mids were fine and I liked it–it’s natural and soothing, but strangely enough the upper mids/lower treble was slightly sibilant and sharp, which made the distant treble stood out more. Comfort wise I liked it a lot too–nothing to complain about. It’s more snug than the D7000, which isn’t good or bad–just depends on taste. Some people like the feeling of snug pillows around the ears, and some like a barely there light clamp. If I had to choose I’d choose D7000. The DX1000′s treble was just too weird and its bass not as extended as the D7000, although the mids are better.

Audio-Technica ATH-W1000X – The W1000X is better balanced than the DX1000 to me–its treble, upper mid/lower treble, mids, bass, and sub-bass are fairly balanced. 30Hz is also a bit rolled-off just like the DX1000. I think the overall sound is probably more natural than the D7000, but the sub-bass isn’t as authoritative. Comfort-wise I like it a lot too–also snug like the DX1000 as opposed to the D7000′s barely there super-light clamp. I find that I prefer auto-adjusting headbands since you don’t have to fiddle with anything or accidentally change the notch setting.

Audio-Technica ATH-ES10 – For a portable, the ES-10 has surprisingly substantial sub-bass–very similar to the M50, with both able to almost match the D7000 all the way down to 30Hz (although the D7000 does it effortlessly, while the two AT models struggle a little bit more). In fact. The ES-10 and the M50 sounded so similar to the point where I wondered if they use the same driver. It’s a pleasant and warm sound without any sibilance, but not as articulate or airy as I’d like. Being a portable on-the-ear is fine since it’s actually pretty comfortable, but I still prefer to not have something pressing on my ears at all. I wouldn’t pick the ES-10 over the M50 since the M50 costs less than half but sounds so similar, and is more comfortable, being full-sized, not to mention it folds down and is quite portable.

Denon AH-D5000 – There are some people out there who feel the D5000 is actually superior in sound quality to the D7000, despite the D7000 being the flagship model and costing a lot more. After comparing the two, I feel the D5000 isn’t at the same level as the D7000. With typical music it may be hard to tell the difference, but a simple sine wave test shows that it isn’t as prominent at 30Hz as the D7000, with some roll-off, and the bass also isn’t as well controlled, punchy, or clean as the D7000. The D7000′s treble is more articulate and clear, and the mids are roughly the same in both. The upper mids/low treble–which is where the sibilance plays (6Khz~8Khz), is also roughly the same on both. So basically the D7000 improves the D5000 in just about every way, while the D5000 isn’t better than the D7000 in any way to me. Both have similar shorcomings (the upper mids/lower treble being a bit sibilant and fatiguing, and the mids are recessed), so if you didn’t like one, you’re not going to like the other.

Here’s the D5000 and the Stax 007MKII behind it. The D5000 isn’t as eye-catching as the D7000 since it doesn’t have the glossy piano finish (but otherwise are identical visually), which makes the D7000 look much classier:
D5000 + Stax 007MKII

Grado Alessandro MS-Pro – Terrible ergonomics. Why would anyone design headphones that sits on your ears uncomfortably like this? While it’s sounds pretty ok in general (nothing to write home about though, especially in the company of all these excellent headphones), I just couldn’t stand the ergonomics.

Corda Symphony.2 – OK, this is where I might lose all credibility (or maybe open some eyes/ears with what I’m about to say). I actually tested my D7000 amped by the Symphony.2 and straight out of my Creative Zen’s headphone out, and I listened and listened and listened, and you know what? If there are any differences, they are so minute that they just aren’t night and day obvious. The Symphony.2 sounded just a bit smoother, dimensional, and better controlled–like a tiny bit more refined and dynamic version, but this is if I really concentrate to hear the differences, and I’m a composer/sound designer. The average person will not be able to hear the difference. But I realize that the D7000 is only 25 Ohms, so it’s very easy to drive, thus probably doesn’t benefit as much from a dedicated headphone amp like the Symphony.2 as high impedance headphones would.

Before I had ever heard any dedicated headphone amps. I had always been skeptical, feeling that if they colored the sound in anyway, then they are just like microphone preamps where different models have different flavors, but nothing like the differences between the headphones themselves. While really amazing mic preamps like the Great River or DAV-BG models do have a larger-than-life sound, they ARE coloring the sound, in a good way–like how audio engineers use EQ’s and compressors. I’m sure that when headphiles go on and on about headphone amps, they are talking about this desirable coloration just like how musicians and audio engineers talk about mic preamps, and I can totally understand that. But at the most basic, the headphone itself needs to sound damn close to the sonic signature you desire, and the amp is just extra icing on the cake–it should not be something you depend on or use to force the sound of any headphone, just like you can’t make a crappy mic sound amazing with a killer preamp, but you can make a good mic sound awesome with a killer preamp.

On that note, neither the Symphony.2 or the Phonitor blew me away. If they had that larger-than-life desirable coloration like the most coveted mic preamps, then I’d understand all the hoopla about headphone amps, but they more or less sounded so much like the headphone out of my Zen player–just slightly more refined, that I don’t see the need to spend over a grand for that tiny bit of difference. Maybe when I hear a very nicely colored amp I’ll changed my mind, just like how I’ve been wanting a Great River or DAV BG mic preamp for their beautiful larger-than-life sound. Until then, they represent the kind of diminishing returns I hate about high-end gear.

Here’s the Symphony.2 amping the DX1000 (I brought sanitary covers for the earcups with me so the store owners will be more likely to allow me to test their expensive high-end models:
 Symphony.2 + DX1000

At the moment, I’m still looking for my ideal pair of headphones, and on my short list are these models:

Audez’e LCD2
Ultrasone Edition 8
Beyerdynamics T1
Stax 007MKII
JH Audio JH-13/JH-16

All of them cost at least a grand, and are considered some of the finest headphones ever made in their respective categories. The only one on that list I have heard is the Stax 007MKII, and as already mentioned, I absolutely loved them. They are also the most expensive by far. I might go for the LCD2 next as it’s developed quite a bit of a reputation immediately upon its release as “the” headphone to rule them all.

I’m getting close to finishing Uncharted: Drake’s Fortune, and it’s starting to get on my nerves. The way the game progresses gets ridiculous, as there are bad guys everywhere, even in places that took Nate’s amazing skills to reach–places that are supposed to be secret and undiscovered. If Nates’s such a clever treasure hunter, then why are the incompetent bad guys always several steps ahead of him, and how is it that they are able to reach such difficult to get to places? What, all the lowly guards are expert climbers and acrobats like Nate? When a game jumps the shark this way, I just lose interest because all narrative credibility just goes down the drain, and you feel like the people behind the game just didn’t give a shit if their narrative made any sense. I’ll probably still finish the game, but only because I’ve gotten pretty far already.

Quickie Movie/TV reviews:

The Pacific - Definitely not as good as Band of Brothers. They should have followed the same group throughout the series instead of three separate characters, as that diluted the power of the narrative and how much we cared for the characters. I actually found the episodes away from the battlefield to be the most interesting, such as episode in Australia where the boys were just chasing skirts. I was also underwhelmed by Hans Zimmer’s score, as it was so by-the-book,bland and derivative that it was perhaps one of the most boring and irrelevant scores he’s ever composed.

V (season one) – I got so turned off by the writing that I didn’t even bother watching the season finale. That whole subplot with the mom and son is just so arbitrary and contrived that I wanted to slap some sense into the writers. It’s a cheap way to create unnecessary drama–that B.S. reasoning for why they are having a communication problem. Any sensible and intelligent parent would have pulled the son aside early on and told him what was happening and kept him the hell away from the V’s. The explanation that if his behavior changed the V’s would’ve noticed was also a steamy load of crap. Why couldn’t the boy just say his mother finally put her foot down and he’s forbidden to interact with the V’s–end of story? The complete lack of security measure inside the ships are also laughable. No security cameras and audio? The Fifth Column moles can just be in any empty room and openly communicate with the resistance as if no one is watching or listening? The medical examination chambers have no security cameras at all? Who comes up with this idiotic mess? In this day and age, when TV shows are outdoing each other in terms of artistic integrity, innovation, and technical achievements, the V remake is an embarrassment. It’s as if the creators and writers have slept through the entire television revolution that began with The Sopranos, and they think they are still living in the early/mid 90′s.

Synecdoche, New York – I really wanted to like this movie because it’s Charlie Kaufman’s directorial debut, but it was just a pretentious and self-pitying mess that comes off as whiny, depressing, and ultimately goes against all the things that are beautiful about our human existence. I can understand and respect the film’s commenting about failure, mortality, loneliness, insecurity, disappointments, and so on, but when everything in the film paints the human existence as glass half empty–no, a glass of dark abyss that’s soul-crushing, you have to wonder if Kaufman has anything in common with the rest of us except maybe the manic depressives and the suicidal. And I’m saying this as a passionate creative person who has been struggling and fighting all of my life to be great at what I do, and who’s lived a life thus far that’s contained regrets and disappointments and failures, not to mention I’m terrified of dying, as I have so much I want to accomplish in my life time that even several lifetimes would not be enough.

In some online discussions, it seemed the people who loved this film will deride anyone who didn’t like the film, accusing them of being shallow, unable to understand the struggle of the artist, or unable to see how Hoffman’s character is in fact all of us, having the same fears, insecurities, misery…etc. I think that’s such a snobby thing to say. Hey, I didn’t like this film and I’ve been pushing myself to be a great artist, composer, writer/director and photographer since puberty, and I starved for my dreams for many years, barely surviving on the shitty money I made as a starving artist and writer-all because I believed in myself and fought for my dreams. I continue to fight for my dreams and push myself hard to accomplish something I can proudly leave behind when I die. All those people who are making such accusations–how hard have YOU fought for your dreams and artistic ideals in your life?

The problem with this film is that there is no silver lining, no redemption, and nothing worth living for at all–everything is bleak, meaningless, and disappointing. While there are things I can identify with in the film, the severity of the main character’s neurosis just reminded me how well-adjusted and normal I actually am in comparison, and that his entire life was this incessant whining and crying over spilt milk, while all the things that inspire happiness and fulfillment are completely absent. It’s one thing to try to convey something honest about life, but it’s a different thing altogether when the life you depict is so uninspiring and pathetic that we want nothing to do with it. It’s also a misleading portrayal of struggling artists, because it only depicts the negative without mentioning any of the positive. If living a life of creativity is so miserable and that’s all there is, then there really wouldn’t be many creative people left in the world. Listen, if I ever become anything like the main character in this film, then please, somebody shoot me and put me out of my misery. In fact, if Charlie Kaufman continues to make films drenched in self-pity and misery like this film, then someone ought to put him out of his misery too because his life is probably filled with only pain and nothing else. Perhaps he should switch to making films about the Holocaust, genocides, wars, or senseless and violent crimes against humanity, as they are also filled with pain and hopelessness. Wait, no–even some of those films can be inspirational and contains beauty and hope.

The Book of Eli - It wasn’t nearly as bad as some people made it out to be. It was in fact pretty entertaining, and was not as preachy as I was afraid it might be. You do have to engage your suspension of disbelief, especially when you learn about Eli’s handicap towards the end, but it could have been far cheesier in lesser hands.

May 30, 2010

Denon AH-D7000 review

NEWS:
The registration to the second run of my workshop closed much earlier than usual because too many people signed up for it and there’s already a waiting list. I’m as surprised as anyone, since the class filled up half-way just after the first couple of days of opening for registration, and that’s before CGSociety even started announcing and promoting it. When it filled up so quickly and people were put on the waiting list, my jaw was on the floor. I think it’s probably because there were already people who couldn’t make the first run and they were already waiting for a second chance to take the workshop, and the glowing testimonials from the students of the first run probably got some people excited too.

For me, this is once again proof that if you put your heart and soul into something and work very hard at going above and beyond the call of duty, people will notice, and they will appreciate your efforts. I was very fortunate that there were students in the first run of the workshop that were open-minded, receptive, intelligent, curious, and hard-working. They made the teaching experience a pleasure, and I hope they will continue to benefit from my instructions down the road in both their artistic and personal journey in life.

WEBLOG:
My Denon AH-D7000 finally arrived, and I’ve been putting it through its paces during the last few weeks. My perspective on the D7000 is from a slightly different angle from most people who have reviewed it, since I have used the previous generation of Denon flagship AH-D950 headphones from mid-90′s to 2005 or so. It was already falling apart around 2001, and I kept taping it back together until it could no longer be fixed and looked like crap. Here’s the D950 all beat up, with electrical tape, worn out pleather earcups, snapped off housing…etc:
denon ah-d950

denon ah-d950-2

It’s been with me all over the place throughout the years though, and will always stay in my memory. It still sounds great too, after the countless dropping on the floor, accidentally blasting at full volume, getting crushed/knocked around in the luggage…etc.

And here’s how the D7000 compares to the previous flagship model:

denon-ah-d7000-2

denon-ah-d7000-3

denon-ah-d7000-1

What was immediately apparent to me about the sound of the D7000 is that it carried the torch of the D950 into the modern age. They have a very similar sonic signature. The D950 have that somewhat hi-fi sound where the treble and bass seems to have that smiley face EQ’d enhancement (just enough to be “exciting,” but not too to become grating and fatiguing), while the D7000 is more accurate, but still retaining the excitement due to the superior sub-bass and detailed treble. The D7000′s sub-bass is definitely more substantial in the 30Hz range, whereas the D950′s sub-bass starts to roll off after 40Hz or so. The D950 emphasizes the upper bass for more punch, but the D7000 does not have any obvious peaks or dips in its bass region and is remarkably flat all the way down to 30Hz. The D7000 is also a tad more refined across the entire frequency range–higher resolution, if you will. In terms of comfort, the D7000 is very comfortable to wear–much more than the D950, since the D950′s earcups are shallow, with your ears touching the drivers, and it can get uncomfortable after a while (my ears would hurt after prolonged listening with the D950). The D7000 is hands down the most comfortable pair of headphones I’ve ever worn–its clamp is feather light, with luxuriously soft pleather earcups that are very well cushioned. Although the clamp is light, the headphones stay on the head pretty well, but I wouldn’t do any dramatic head-banging with it on though.

Compared to my Sennheiser HD650, the D7000 sounds like a smiley face EQ’d version of the HD650, with the treble being sharper, and the sub-bass more extended and prominent. The one thing I wish the HD650 could do better in is the sub-bass, since below 40Hz it starts to roll off, and the D7000 takes care of this problem, with the sub-bass remaining prominent and flat all the way down to 30Hz (I haven’t tested frequencies below 30Hz yet), which is a rare thing for headphones. The sharper treble of the D7000 can be a tad too bright on listening material that’s mixed/mastered on the bright side, and on such materials, I would prefer if the D7000′s treble is slightly more subdued. Although the D7000 is a closed-back design, it might as well be open-back because it barely isolates outside noise at all; however, the strange thing is that it isolates the headphone’s output much better, so leakage isn’t nearly as bad as with actual open-back cans (in other words, it sucks at blocking outside noise, but controls leakage into the outside world pretty well). Comfort-wise, I do think the D7000 is more comfortable due to the feather-light clamping of the earcups, but with pleather, no matter how soft, will never be as comfortable as velour, since pleather will get too warm and your face might sweat a little (or at least get slightly sticky). I bought a bag of headphone sanitary covers and with them on, the D7000′s pleather problem is solved. The sanitary covers are of similar material as some of the disinfectant moist wipes, so while they are soft, they are still not as soft as velour. At least they don’t get sticky like pleather though. The HD650 while has very soft velour earcups, clamp a lot tighter, but it’s a snug kind of tight, and quite comfortable, unless you have a ultra-sensitive head where any amount of pressure will give you a headache. I never had any problems with the HD650′s clamping pressure. Here’s how the D7000 looks with the sanitary covers on:

sanitary_covers-4

One of the reasons I got the D7000 was with the wish that it would be like if the Audio-Technica ATH-M50 and the HD650 got married and had a kid. So, does the D7000 sound anything like that? Well, yes and no. I already talked about how it compared to the HD650, so now I’ll talk about how it compares to the M50. One thing I really liked about the M50 is its sub-bass capabilities, remaining prominent down to 30Hz. Not many headphones can sound like there’s a subwoofer in your head, and the M50 is one of them. While the M50 sounds pretty neutral and flat in general, it doesn’t sound quite natural–as if the engineers somehow pushed and pulled it into sounding that way, instead of it naturally sounding that way with the way its components naturally work together. For example, the treble has a slightly metallic feel, as if a very narrow band of the treble frequencies was EQ’d to get that clarity, but it’s carefully tweaked so that it sounds very comfortable and never fatiguing. In fact, the M50 is one of the most comfortable headphones in terms of how pleasant it sounds. It is never too bright, but has plenty of clarity. The same goes for its bass–it’s full and substantial, but never overwhelming like some of the bass-head headphones where the bass is so bloated that it intrudes into the other frequencies.

So how does the D7000 compare to the M50? In terms of sub-bass prominence, they are about the same, although the D7000 distorts less when reproducing pure 30Hz sine wave test tones. The D7000′s treble is sharper for sure, and the overall clarity is also better, making the M50 sound warmer in comparison. The soundstage of the D7000 is also very good–almost on par with the HD650, while the M50 has a more typical closed-back sound with smaller soundstage. In terms of comfort, while the M50′s pretty good, the D7000 is definitely more comfortable. Without the sanitary covers, the M50 gets warm faster than the D7000, but with the covers, the M50′s pleather problem is also solved. Here’s the M50 with sanitary covers on:

sanitary_covers-5

In conclusion, the D7000 is a beautiful sounding pair of headphones (though with obvious flaws), possessing authoritative sub-bass presence and punch, a smooth, clean, and detailed sonic signature, a big soundstage that’s highly unusual for a closed-back design, very comfortable to wear, and visually attractive in that “premium high-end” style. Some people say the D7000 has recessed mids, and I agree. To me, it’s not just because the treble is more detailed and the sub-bass is substantial that it creates the illusion that the mids are recessed–the mid-range is actually recessed–at least compared to my Klein + Hummel O 300D‘s and other headphones. But it needs to be said that the recessed mid-range is in general not a good thing, especially when the vocals and instruments end up lacking body and weight on the D7000. Whether it sounds a tad bright and sibilant in treble depends on personal taste. I’m very sensitive to bright sounding headphones and speakers, as I find them very fatiguing and grating to endure–as if my ears will start bleeding if I keep listening, and the D7000 usually sounds detailed instead of fatiguing, but on some really bright material it becomes brighter than comfortable for me. It’s only somewhat of an issue though, as most of the music in my collection are not mixed and mastered by half-deaf engineers who have lost most of their hearing above 6Khz. :D But when the recessed mids combine with the slightly sibilant brightness, it can make some material really splashy, such as the song “William, It’s Really Nothing” by The Smiths–the hi-hat, tambourine, and strumming of the guitar all blend into this splashy mess that has no real body or definition. While the treble is up for debate, I don’t think the bass is–since I did extensive tests on its bass region and found it to be very flat and neutral all the way down to 30Hz and probably lower too.

The D7000 is a premium high-end pair of headphones, and as such, its price tag reflects that. Is it worth the money? I paid $571 for it before taxes and shipping, while some places sell it at its full retail price, which is $1,000. I don’t think I would pay $1,000 for it, but at $571 it’s acceptable (relatively speaking, since high-end anything is always a game of diminishing returns. It sure doesn’t sound five times better than the M50. In fact, with the recessed mids and slightly bright sound, it’s hard to say if it’s really “better”–maybe just different). Will I sell off my other headphones and keep just the D7000? It’s too early to say right now–I’ll have to live with the D7000 for a while longer before I even contemplate that thought.

To accommodate the new arrive in my headphone collection, I got a triple stand with adjustable arms. It’s very convenient and flexible, and since I don’t foresee myself adding anymore headphones, I think it’ll do just fine:

headphones_stand-1

headphones_stand-2

sanitary_covers-3

sanitary_covers-6

Now, in the context of serious audio work (mixing, mastering…etc), how doe the D7000 fare? Would I use the D7000 for that purpose? As you probably guessed from my review, the answer is probably no. It’s more of a “fun” pair of headphones, although its bass frequencies are very good–accurate enough to mix with, I can’t exactly use a pair of headphones just of one frequency range. The treble is a bit too sharp and the mids are a bit recessed, so it’s not as balanced as I would need for critical work. In comparison, I’d say the M50 and the HD650 are both more balanced overall. But at the same time, if I used it for audio work, I could end up with a warmer sounding mix that has great mid-range clarity and very balanced bass–maybe that’s not so bad after all.

Mosquitoes are a big problem in Asia, and even living up on the 7th floor, I still get insane number of mosquito bites during the summer. I used to use repellent sprays and they don’t smell very good and I hate having to spray myself down every day. I’ve tried liquid repellents that you plug into an electrical outlet, and I’m always thinking that they are bad for my health, especially when I have all the doors and windows closed during the summer due to running air conditioning. I also considered one of those bug zapping lights, but they are really loud whenever it zaps something, and that kind of loud snapping sound would keep us awake at night, which defeats the purpose in the first place. Finally, I found carbon dioxide-based UV lights with a running fan that traps mosquitoes and let them die of dehydration. We tried it for a week and found that it does work if you follow the instructions closely, and we ended up buying two more to disperse among the different areas of the home. They look something like this:
mosquito_light

The trap basically uses the UV light in conjunction with chemical reaction that emits carbon dioxide that attracts the mosquitoes (mosquitoes find prey by following exhaled carbon dioxide). There is no snapping sound since the trap doesn’t kill mosquitoes that way–it just sucks them into the trap with the fan and then the fan will dehydrate them until they die. I’m pretty happy with this method so far, although you do have to follow the instructions on where to place the traps, what time of the day to turn them on, and to have them as the main light source whenever you’re not in the room–all of which makes them more effective.

After trying out various demos of writing software and doing lots of comparisons, I have finally decided on the one I’ll be using from now on, and it’s Writer’s Cafe, which has one of the best implementations of tracking multiple storylines, which is a really helpful tool for structuring complex plot developments. WriteItNow is also very strong, with a very nice character relationships chart and very intuitive GUI (far more so than Writer’s Cafe). If it wasn’t for the fact that Writer’s Cafe can do screenplay formatting and multiple storylines mapping, I would pick WriteItNow. But now I don’t have to choose because when I corresponded with the creator of WriteItNow and offered many suggestions on how to improve it, he liked my suggestions so much that he gave me free activation codes so I could use the software. What a nice guy! If he implements my suggestions, I’ll gladly pay for a license, as I think with some improvements, WriteItNow could be much better than Writer’s Cafe in terms of intuitiveness and usefulness.

I finally received my PS3 games, and I’ve been playing Uncharted: Drake’s Fortune, Killzone 2, God of War Collection, and Demon’s Souls. So far, Killzone 2 feels a bit shallow, despite how gorgeous it is visually. God of War is trying my patience a little since I was never really a fan of platformers, and I’m mostly playing it for the story, which means the gameplay can feel a little like a chore for me at times. While combat is done very well, it’s also kind of shallow in general. Demon’s Souls is insanely hard, and I’m not quite sure how much punishment I’m willing to take before I just drop it altogether. Drake’s Fortune is probably the most fun so far, but mainly because of the writing–it’s more entertaining than the other games in general for me because the gameplay is more balanced between tedium and variety, (I’m not into puzzles, and Drake’s Fortune doesn’t have too many of them) although the platforming is a bit annoying a times. I guess I’m really just a FPS, action/adventure, and western RPG guy at heart. Platformers were never really my thing, as well as sports, RTS, J-RPG, racing, simulations, MMO’s…etc.

Quickie movie/TV reviews

Lost (season six) – Finally, it ended. I’m somewhat disappointed by the series finale, and I think the amount of mystery and the weight given to them compared to the explanations offered are way too unbalanced. If this is supposed to be a show about characters, then they should have scaled back the mysteries and concentrated on the characters, but with all the sci-fi, supernatural, and mythological elements in our faces constantly, What we got for answers are just underwhelming. The tone and the scale of the mysteries built up during the six seasons should have culminated in something epic and mind-boggling, and nothing short of biblical proportions would’ve been satisfying. It was nice to see all the characters finding closure though, including long-dead characters (although some were missing, probably due to logistical reasons like working on other films/TV shows). I don’t know if I’m the only one who thinks so, but Elizabeth Mitchell is much more attractive in Lost than she is in V. Part of it is because Juliet’s personality is more attractive to me than Erica’s, and I also think the stylists and makeup artists are better on Lost as well (even when the characters look haggard), not to mention the writing is better, so the dialogues in turn make the characters more interesting in Lost.

Arrested Development (season one) – I have heard so much about this show, and I finally gave first season a shot, and while it’s pretty entertaining, I found it pretty empty ultimately. I’m a firm believer that comedies must have some kind of emotional core so that we could care about the characters that we are laughing at/with, and I just don’t feel that with any of the characters or plot developments in this show. I’ll give second season a try and see if it gets any better.

The Office (season six) – This show could do no wrong in my eyes. I have loved just about every single episode since the pilot, and unlike 99% of TV series out there, it’s not showing any signs of fizzling out.

Kick-Ass - One of the most irreverent, entertaining, and fun movies I’ve seen in a very long time. All the critics who bashed for its depiction of a vigilante little girl taking down bad guys don’t really have any compelling arguments, because if she was “Hit-Boy” instead of “Hit-Girl,” there probably wouldn’t be nearly as much fuss made over the whole issue. Also, her violence was always directed at the bad guys–real scumbags that had it coming, so it’s not like she was out there killing grandmothers or little babies. As for the cussing–please, it’s a stylized, cartoony version of reality, much like how in the 80′s it was popular to have elderly folks act violently and cuss. It’s shock entertainment and irreverent fun, and you’re not supposed to take it seriously. I suppose the critics who had a problem with Kick-Ass are likely the kind of person who can’t stand Quentin Tarantino‘s films, and they probably hated Ellen Page in Hard Candy too.

April 10, 2010

Daydreams in Cold Weather

WEBLOG:
It’s kind of strange for someone who’s so passionate about music to actually blog very little about musical artists or just music I love, while I write far more about movies, TV shows, video games, and books. Sure, I write about musical instruments and audio gear a lot, but I don’t really write much about just music in general. I think the reason is because the Influences page already lists all the music I love including the reasons why, but it’s also because I rarely find entire albums I really like. While a really good song is better than none, I tend to not think as highly of an artist until he has proven he’s more than a one-hit wonder; I want to see clear artistic direction that maps the artist’s creative footprints. The key here being that footprints is plural–a single print doesn’t tell me enough except that maybe there was a singular and isolated moment of inspiration–one that might never happens again, but multiple prints traveling in a clear direction tells me it’s not a fluke–that it’s something to be taken seriously.

With movies, TV shows, video games, and books, you have to invest a bit of time into them to find out if they’re any good, or if you even want to bother with finishing them. This creates the situation where even if you don’t like something, you want to talk about it anyway because you already invested time into your dislike for it, and also, you kind of want to just vent or warn others. With music, a typical track is much shorter than any of the other mediums mentioned, so if you don’t like something, you just skip to the next track and it’s out of hearing and out of mind. It’s also much easier and faster for me to assess whether I like a piece of music–I listen to the intro, jump forward about 1/6 of the track and listen for a few seconds. If it still sounds the same without any interesting progression in melody, arrangement, sonic textures, rhythm…etc, then I jump forward by another 1/6 and listen again. I’ll do this until either I hear something interesting that demonstrates the song actually isn’t monotonous, repetitive, and lacking imagination, or the song’s over before anything interesting happens and I rate it the number of stars it deserves (I use J River Media Center as my media librarian) and move on to the next track.

This isn’t to say that I can’t enjoy music that’s built on repetition–I certainly can, but it has to have something interesting about it–be it interesting sonic textures, rhythm, subtle and muti-layered progressions, or anything else that makes it not merely repetitive. There are plenty of amazing electronic music that’s built on the foundation of repetition, but it’s the subtle progressions and shifts in the layers of sonic textures and rhythm that makes them hypnotic and groovy.

With that said, I want to talk about a couple of interesting musical artists I’ve enjoyed recently. The first one is John Tejada, an electronic musician who’s associated with the Detroit techno and house movements. I accidentally stumbled upon a couple of tracks from his album The Matrix of Us a few months ago and really enjoyed them. I then dug into his musical career thus far and hoped to find other gems. After some digging, I was starting to get a little disappointed as many of his other releases were of of 4/4 on the floor sparse techno that sort of relied on the same kind of approach and just wasn’t rhythmically very interesting. Then I came upon his 2002 album Daydreams in Cold Weather, one that features this insanely cute cover:

One listen and I knew I had found the gem I was looking for. It’s an amazing album full of percolating electronic particles and synth bleeps, without any of that 4/4 on the floor monotonousness, and the melodic contours are in that impressionistic and abstract vein–not something you could immediately remember and hum, but definitely melodic. It reminded me of how I felt when I heard LFO‘s Frequencies, for the first time in 1991, or how I felt when I heard Orbital‘s Snivilisation, and also some of stuff by Plaid. Out of the twelve tracks on the album, I really liked all except three tracks, and that’s definitely a very rare thing when it comes to full albums–usually if I like half of the album I’m already quite happy.

Another musical artist worth mentioning is Devin Townsend, whose various projects (including the infamous Strapping Young Lad) span an interesting range of metal, progressive rock, ambient electronic, punk, and in the case of SYL, extreme metal (SYL is supposed to be a tongue-in-cheek spoof of black/death metal). What’s interesting about Townsend is his diverse influences and his melodic and intelligent take on metal. He’s got a sense of humor and can laugh at himself and the musical genres he works in, and I really like his vocals–magnetic, powerful, and soothing all at the same time. The dude’s a good guitar player too, not to mention a good producer with a unique sound that’s lush and layered. Unfortunately, I only really like one or two songs from each album. Although the other songs are good too, they hovering around three out of five stars ratings instead of the four (really like) or five (love). The two albums I would recommend to try would be Ocean Machine: Biomech, and Addicted.

One of Elena’s nieces is currently staying with us for a couple of months, and one of her other nieces (a few months older) would come and hang out with her cousin on the weekends. So we pretty much have a twelve and a thirteen yr-old around all the time now. At that age, they really aren’t quite aware enough of their femininity yet (at least not with these two), so they mostly act similar to boys around the same age–just as loud and rowdy. What we find frustrating is that we can see all kinds of symptoms of bad parenting on them–bad habits, misguided mentalities, ignorance, and complete lack of any manners–are all because their parents haven’t a clue about how to properly raise children and teach them right from wrong, common sense, and what it means to be a worthy human being.

After living with us for over a month, Elena’s niece would constantly make comments like “How come everything you two say make so much sense and you make me realize things I never thought about before or cared about?” or “How come your way of thinking/doing things is so much more effective and meaningful” or “How come no one has ever taught me that before?” From personal hygiene, daily routines, good habits, nutrition, how to deal with bullies, how to study properly, to having honorable and noble values in life–all of these things seem to be neglected in their upbringing. Some of the stuff is so basic and foundational in every human child’s development that we have to wonder what the hell their parents have been doing for the last dozen years? Both girls never eats any fruits or vegetables or barely drink any water at all, and their parents don’t do a thing about it. One of them have not turned in any homework for God knows how long, and is so far behind in her studies that we can’t believe the school hasn’t kicked her out yet. Once again, what the f-cking hell were the parents doing?

Since she’ll only be staying with us for a couple of months, we try to teach her as many good habits as possible and educate her on right and wrong, what it means to be a noble person, what good nutrition is, how to maintain personal hygiene, and a bunch of other stuff. The truth is, Elena and I have decided a while ago that we don’t want any children, and now it it’s very clear to us that part of the reason is because we know we’ll be very responsible and involved parents, and we would essentially devote all of our time and energy to raising the kind of children that we’d be proud of–children that would grow up to become respectable human beings. And it’s because we know how involved we’d become that we prefer not to do it, as there are already too many things in this lifetime we don’t have time for already. For this lifetime, we’ll be content with educating other people’s children as the cool aunt and uncle (and in my case, also as a teacher).

I’m currently still playing Mass Effect 2, and one thing that I find kind of silly in these types of games is how you could wander around and just take stuff from other people’s offices and homes and they just let you do it like it doesn’t cost them a thing. While it’s kind of silly, I still prefer it to the drastic opposite approach, such as in the Elder Scroll games where if you even touch anything, the person would immediately start to attack you. To take it that far is even far more stupid because overdoing it and turns it into a pain in the ass. Something that’s actually logical would be nice, but I have no faith we’ll see anything of the sort anytime soon.

While in the Afterlife club on Omega station, I was struck by how groovy the club music was, and I did a bit of research and found out it’s a track called Callista by Saki Kaskas, a composer who used to be the in-house composer at EA and has scored a number of games. Unfortunately, Callista seems to be the only track he did in that style, whereas the other music he’s done are pretty stereotypical hyper-kinetic racing game music–too arcade-like and musically on the garish side).

I also started on Battlefield: Bad Company 2, and it felt so much like the COD games that I couldn’t help but compare the two franchises. The main difference I noticed was the bad character art and animation in BC2. There are some visual styles where you just have to do motion-capture, otherwise the mediocre quality keyframe animation would stick out like sore thumbs. I’m not saying keyframe animation can’t look very convincing or natural–just that it’s takes some of the best animators in the world to pull it off, and whoever the animators where on this game are just not that good. The character models and textures also had that horrible Uncanny Valley look to them. Although just about all video games don’t have convincing looking realistic characters, the ones in this game are particularly bad that you can’t help but notice them.

The destructive environments in BC2 is a good idea and pretty refreshing–reminds me a bit of Red Faction. It would be even cooler if when a wall or ceiling collapses, it would actually cause physical damage to the players–maybe even pin them down until teammates come and do a rescue.

I made my way towards the end of Resident Evil 5, and I’ve lost the desire to finish it because of how unnecessarily difficult they made the final boss fights. So much of Japanese game design is based on arbitrary ridiculousness and crassness that I can only take them for so long. RE5 is already much less annoying than RE4, but it still annoys. For example, the loot that’s left by enemies would actually disappear if you don’t collect them fast enough. What the hell is that crap? How does items just vanish into thin air like that? That’s the kind of game design mentality left over from the previous century that really sticks out in today’s modern games–just illogical and lazy design. There are other lazy game design like when you’re turning the mirrors to line up the beams, Sheva just stand in one spot and refuses to do anything. To make it worse, if you call to her, she’ll just say something totally out of context like “You gotta be kidding” or “No way! Not a chance!” It’s such lazy game design when the designer allows situations like that to happen. Why not just create context-appropriate dialogues and responses? I really hope that outdated game design approaches like that will get phased out and left behind, because moving forward, there’s just no room for these lazy and outdated approaches in modern games.

What exactly is the definition of a horror film? I often see movies that get categorized as horror when they are nowhere near being horror films. Too often, supernatural thrillers or dramas are being labeled as horror and I think the people who are doing it are either ignorant or doing it on purpose for marketing purposes. For example, Interview with the Vampire is not a horror film. Let the Right One In is not a horror film. Both to me are dramas with a supernatural premise. Neither films are supposed to scare the crap out of you. Horror films to me are Night of the Living Dead, The Exorcist, Descent…etc, where the main goal of the films are to scare the living daylights out of you. Slasher films I also consider horror films because they pin you to your seat and fill you with suffocating dread and terror. Movies like Donnie Darko are also not horror films–they are supernatural thrillers, and not meant to scare the crap out of you, even if they make you uncomfortable. What about Aliens or The Mist? Both are sci-fi/action/horror, so yes, technically they certainly have elements of horror, but offset with plenty of sci-fi action. Anyway, I’m sure I’m not the only one who notices this and wonders about it.

Quickie movie and TV reviews:

Army of Shadows – I checked this one out because it’s hailed as a masterpiece. I thought the film had a few good moments, but as a whole the pacing was kind of slow and the direction lacked dynamic energy. I think this is because the language of cinema has evolved so much in the last few decades, and many films made in the previous decades feels too stagnant or safe, as many of the techniques used today have yet been developed. This isn’t to say that all older movies don’t hold up–many certainly do, and one of my all time favorite films was from the silent film era (Sunrise: A Song of Two Humans). The machine gun escape scene was totally unexpected and ingenious, but it was really the only scene I felt truly compelling. There was one scene where they obviously used an electrical light to masquerade as an oil lamp, and it was ridiculously bad because as the character walked around the room with the oil lamp, you could clearly see the electrical cord being dragged around with it. That’s got to be one of the worst blunders I’ve ever seen in any film–especially considering the serious subject matter and the movie’s status in cinema history.

Pineapple Express - A movie that tries too hard for laughs in some scenes and drags out for too long–as if the director told the actors to just improvise and then later forgot to edit the footage. I was happy to see the actors from Freaks and Geeks though–I really enjoyed that show and I was bummed out that it only lasted one season.

Survival of the Dead - Another big disappointment from George Romero. Diary of the Dead as so bad that if I had watched it without reading the credits, I’d never have believed it was directed by him. Survival of the dead was about as bad, with really clumsy editing, directing, acting, and just not something I’d expect from a veteran filmmaker. I suppose in a way I really don’t care anymore, because Romero’s golden years have been over for a while now, and his influences have already spread far and wide. There has been a zombie revival in the last several years and the genre is looking quite healthy, even if Romero has become irrelevant in his old age.

Daybreakers - A pretty entertaining vampire flick with a twist. I could see why they cast Ethan Hawk, because this film has a similar vibe to Gattaca, where it’s near-future, and there’s been a drastic change in human society, with a moral motif at the center of story.

I am Sam – I had seen the first half of this film a while ago but didn’t get to finish it. This time I tracked it down and finished it. I still can’t believe how good Dakota Fanning was at that age–precocious, expressive, and very natural. The movie’s convoluted message is a bit hard to swallow, but its heart is in the right place. The father’s obviously incompetent, being mentally handicapped (Sean Penn was really good), although through no fault of his own, yet the movie makes sure she ends up with him anyway–a naive and sentimental “love conquers all” mentality that in real life would do more harm than good.

Bandslam – The movie tries too hard to be hip and touching, but ends up being too contrived. Even though it’s supposed to be a harmless family/teen drama and we’re not supposed to be too picky about it, I still have to say how disappointed I was at how the process of creating music was portrayed. This is one of the things that an overwhelmingly high percentage of movies totally get wrong. Nobody creates music the way it’s portrayed in the movies. People don’t just stand around and talk about how to play song for a few minutes and then everyone immediately nails it on the first try–that’s is utter and complete bullshit. It’s almost as bad as August Rush, another movie that portrays the musical creative process as some ridiculous magical trick, and in turn insults all the real musicians on the planet.

And what the hell was the significance of David Bowie in the movie? Not once did the main character even explain to anyone why he idolizes Bowie, and the truth is, I’m sure a very high percentage of the movie’s target audience has no idea about any of the musical artists and styles that the characters talked about. It’s just an awkward film where the writer is aiming at a younger audience, yet uses references that have nothing to do with what young people actually listen to today, and for the most part are completely irrelevant to them.

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress